Icertis vs. Conga

Icertis vs. Conga

The main difference between Icertis and Conga is mobile compatibility. Icertis offers mobile apps for iOS and Android devices for on-the-go access. On the other hand, Conga is limited to Windows and Mac platforms.

This article delves into the significant differences between Icertis vs. Conga.

Icertis vs. Conga Comparison

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Icertis

Windows

Mac

iOS

Android

SaaS/Web

Yes

Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Custom Plans

Conga

Windows

Mac

SaaS/Web

Yes

Amazon S3, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint, Salesforce Files, and more.

Yes

Starts at $35

User Interface

Kicking off our comprehensive Icertis vs. Conga comparison, let’s start with their user interfaces.

Icertis’ design focuses on simplicity, making it easy for users to navigate and efficiently manage contracts and related processes. Users can access key functionalities, monitor contract status, and perform tasks seamlessly.

Similarly, Conga’s user interface features a clean and well-organized design that facilitates a seamless contract management experience. It offers a dashboard that allows users to navigate through various functionalities easily. This includes document creation, editing, and tracking. 

Security

Icertis data at rest is protected with AES 256-bit encryption, a secure standard offered by underlying Azure services. The encryption keys are managed by Microsoft Azure, ensuring strong security. Additionally, Icertis can manage encryption keys in the Azure Key Vault if needed.

Conga’s security features include encryption, anti-virus, and anti-malware controls. It also boasts physical data protection and regular audits and certifications. These ensure the security and integrity of documents and data within their platform.

Contract Lifecycle Management

Icertis provides a holistic solution for overseeing contracts. This platform equips users with a comprehensive set of tools to manage the entire contract lifecycle. This includes the initial stages of creation and negotiation through execution, secure storage, and in-depth analysis.

Conga’s CLM solution mainly stands out for its seamless integration with Salesforce. This feature greatly enhances contract management for businesses. This integration also allows users to manage contracts directly within the Salesforce environment, streamlining the entire contract lifecycle.

Icertis vs. Conga

Electronic Signature Integration

Icertis collaborates with Adobe Sign to ensure a secure and compliant signing process. Users can conveniently prepare, send, sign, and track documents with electronic signatures.

On the other hand, the Conga Sign is an integral part of Conga. It plays a pivotal role in addressing the intricacies of revenue lifecycle management. Users have the flexibility to launch an eSignature process from any object within Salesforce. This can be achieved through pre-defined templates or by adding signature tags in real-time.

Contract Repository

Icertis offers an enterprise-level approach to contract management. It consolidates an organization’s commitments into a unified CLM system. This approach replaces traditional manual contract management methods with automated systems, facilitating a streamlined and efficient process.

Conga’s contract repository uses AI, which automatically extracts contract data, ensuring that important information is readily available and easily accessible. This intelligent approach simplifies contract management and enhances contract visibility.

Integrations

Icertis offers an extensive range of integrations. This includes popular platforms like Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Conga’s integrations include platforms like Amazon S3, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint, Salesforce Files, and many more. These integrations facilitate seamless data sharing and collaboration.

Mobile and Other Device Access

To conclude our evaluation of Icertis vs. Conga, let’s explore their accessibility across mobile devices and other platforms.

Icertis boasts accessibility across various devices and operating systems. Users can seamlessly access the platform on Windows and Mac computers. Additionally, Icertis offers dedicated mobile applications for both iOS and Android devices.

Conga provides accessibility across Windows and Mac computers. However, it’s important to note that Conga does not offer dedicated mobile applications for iOS and Android devices.

Icertis vs. Conga

Fill: The Best Alternative to Icertis

Looking for the next best alternative to Icertis? Fill emerges as the preferred choice for several compelling reasons. Unlike Icertis, Fill provides users with the advantage of a free trial. This allows you to explore Fill’s capabilities without any commitment, ensuring that they align with your specific needs before deciding.

Moreover, Fill introduces the convenience of unlimited envelopes, allowing users to create and manage contracts without limitations. This flexible feature sets it apart from Icertis, providing greater freedom in document management.

Lastly, Fill is designed to simplify contract management for businesses of all sizes. Whether you’re a small startup or a larger enterprise, Fill’s user-friendly approach ensures efficient document workflows and control.

Shift to effortless contract management with Fill. Sign up for a free account today. 

Andria Pacina

Andria is a seasoned content writer, specializing in document management solutions and HIPAA compliance, providing valuable insights for businesses and professionals alike.

Related Stories

Ironclad vs. PandaDoc

Ironclad vs. PandaDoc

The main difference between Ironclad and PandaDoc lies in their approach to reporting and analytics. With Ironclad, you'll be given a thorough breakdown of your contract portfolio. PandaDoc distinguishes itself through its exceptional capability to provide real-time analytics.

Xodo vs. Foxit

Xodo vs. Foxit

The main difference between Xodo and Foxit is defined by their unique feature sets, user customization, and approach to document security and management. Foxit places a premium on user customization and document security, while Xodo emphasizes swift document processing and seamless integrations.

PDF-Xchange vs. Bluebeam

PDF-Xchange vs. Bluebeam

The main difference between PDF-Xchange and Bluebeam is its approach to collaboration and commenting features. PDF-Xchange is basic and user-friendly, whereas Bluebeam combines project management and document editing.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up