SpiderOak vs Tresorit

The main difference between SpiderOak and Tresorit is their approach to delivering cloud storage solutions. SpiderOak operates as a privacy-centric, cloud-based data storage center, providing a file sync and cloud storage/backup solution. In contrast, Tresorit prioritizes secure file sync and sharing, incorporating a flexible permission system for controlling user access to data.

Comparing SpiderOak and Tresorit

We’ve compiled a table to help you compare SpiderOak and Tresorit cloud storage features

 Storage CapacitySecurityBackup and RecoveryIntegration with Existing SystemsCost
SpiderOakUnlimitedBlockchain technologySpiderOak ONESpiderOak Hive Syncing Syste, & OS Integration$6/month
Tresorit200GB to 5TBUnique encryption keysSync serviceSingle Sign-On, Tresorit Drive Integration, Outlook$10.42/month
Now, let’s get an in-depth look at each feature in this SpiderOak and Tresorit Comparison
SpiderOak vs Tresorit

Storage Capacity

If you are looking for unlimited Storage, Spideroak is a great choice. This service has different storage capacity plans for users, and it offers a 21-day trial with 250GB of free storage for users to test before committing. It is important to note that there Tresorit alternative has its data stored on US servers, and local backups may require a little workaround.

On the other hand, Tresorit offers different storage plans ranging from 200GB to 5TB. Tresorit Basic is a free plan, that offers 3GB of encrypted storage, a 500MB file limit, and supports up to two devices. It also offers default storage plans: 1TB for Personal, 4TB for Professional, and 1-2TB per user for team accounts.


When it comes to security, the Tresorit alternative- SpiderOak, employs blockchain technology for file storage and management. This allows it to encrypt files before upload or download to ensure exclusive user access. Its zero-knowledge encryption system is its way of assuring its users that their accounts and sensitive data are secure. In case of forgotten passwords, users need to reset them, as the service lacks access to user passwords.

Tresorit utilizes distinct, randomly generated encryption keys for each file and associated data, preventing unauthorized access. It provides end-to-end encryption for files, file metadata, and folder sharing, ensuring compliance with GDPR. Based in Switzerland and known for robust privacy laws, Tresorit is able to encrypt its client-server communications through the TLS 1.2 channel.

File Sharing Capabilities

SpiderOak allows users to create share links for files and folders, enabling secure sharing with others. There is a partial compromise when it comes to SpiderOak’s no-knowledge policy during file sharing, because the service requires generating a share link. Sharing on SpiderOak keeps data private, but generating a share link compromises some of the no-knowledge pacts.

SpiderOak alternative Tresorit offers encrypted share links with file requests, expiration dates, and download limits, enabling unlimited file sharing. It also offers Tresorit for Outlook and Gmail plugins, enabling secure file sharing via email. Tresorit integrates file sharing with end-to-end encryption and a zero-knowledge system, ensuring constant protection for shared files.

SpiderOak vs Tresorit

Backup and Recovery

SpiderOak’s backup solution, SpiderOak ONE, is renowned for its robust encryption, zero-knowledge policy, and transparent privacy guidelines. It conducts continuous backups and permits users to schedule backups, preventing excessive resource usage. The service includes end-to-end encryption, automatic, unlimited version tracking, and complies with HIPAA and GDPR regulations.

Tresorit, initially recognized as a syncing service, is also positioned as a backup solution. This service ensures secure cloud file synchronization and sharing for convenient and protected access from any location. With a strong focus on end-to-end encryption and data security, the SpiderOak alternative offers a secure backup solution.

Integration with Existing Systems

SpiderOak enables users to integrate with existing systems, facilitating file synchronization across diverse platforms through the Hive Syncing System. This system ensures access to files on various devices. In Preferences – General, SpiderOak provides Windows-exclusive settings to enable convenient OS Integration for right-click access to files and folders. Additionally, SpiderOak provides a command line reference compatible with supported desktop operating systems like Windows, Mac, and Linux.

On the other hand, the alternative to SpiderOak – Tresorit provides a range of integration options. This includes SSO integration and Tresorit Drive integration, which seamlessly integrates with the file manager for direct desktop file access. Tresorit also offers plugins for popular email platforms such as Outlook and Gmail, ensuring secure file sharing through email.

Fill: A Better Alternative to SpiderOak

Fill emerges as a frontrunner, challenging the standards set by SpiderOak and Tresorit. Fill excels as a robust, privacy-focused cloud storage for individuals and businesses with innovative features and customizable plans.

Fill offers seamless cross-platform compatibility, allowing users to access their data from various devices and operating systems. Fill allows you to simplify file syncing across devices, ensuring you have the latest file versions on all connected platforms. This real-time synchronization will supercharge your workflow efficiency and collaboration.

Looking for everything in SpiderOak, Tresorit, and more? Try Fill for free.

Amara Chiaha

Amara is a copywriter at Amplify Ventures who uses her experience with UX writing to provide relevant content structure for clients exploring HIPAA compliant document management solutions.

Related Stories

ShareFile vs. Google Drive

The main difference between ShareFile and Google Drive lies in their targeted user bases. ShareFile is more suited for businesses needing secure file sharing. Google Drive, on the other hand, caters to a broader audience with its free storage and easy collaboration through integrated Google Workspace apps.

Egnyte vs. Dropbox

Egnyte vs Dropbox

The main difference between Egnyte and Dropbox lies in their storage plans. Dropbox accommodates different storage needs, offering packages from 2GB to unlimited storage for varied users. It also includes 3TB and 5TB options for personal and small businesses. Egnyte offers plans such as the 'Office Plan' that accommodates up to 5 users with 5TB of storage. Additionally, they offer a 'Business Plan,' which provides 10TB for a minimum of 25 users.

Tresorit vs. Dropbox

The main difference between Tresorit and Dropbox is their target audience. While both provide services for individuals, Tresorit is more focused on providing enterprise solutions. Dropbox, on the other hand, has a broader appeal among individual users due to its free storage option.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.