Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

The main difference between Ninja Forms and WPForms lies in their approach to pricing. WPForms has a more intuitive interface and broader options but is pricier. Ninja Forms offers a flexible, developer-friendly platform at a lower cost.

This article will cover additional differences between Ninja Forms vs. WPForms.

Comparing Ninja Forms vs. WPForms 

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Ninja Forms

Windows

Mac

SaaS/Web

No

Google Workspace, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Starts at $99 per year

WPForms

Windows

Mac

SaaS/Web

No

Google Workspace, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Starts at $79 per year

User-Friendly Interface

Starting our in-depth comparison of Ninja Forms vs. WPForms, let’s assess their user-friendly interfaces.

Ninja Forms offers a drag-and-drop form builder that simplifies creating professional-looking forms, even for beginners. It is designed to work seamlessly with WordPress and enables users to handpick the needed features. Those with limited technical knowledge or coding experience can easily navigate the interface as well.

WPForms also features a drag-and-drop form builder, allowing for quick and straightforward creation of various forms. The interface is intuitive, with extensive customization options that don’t require coding skills. This combination of simplicity, flexibility, and functionality makes WPForms an excellent tool for novices and experienced developers.

Customization

Ninja Forms gives its users the option to alter the layout, add custom CSS, and even use advanced CSS features if they are familiar with it. The platform offers a feature called ‘Input Mask,’ which allows users to customize how data is entered into their forms.

Additionally, the platform also supports add-ons, enabling users to tailor functionality to their specific needs, such as generating a fully customizable PDF from form submissions.

WPForms also offers customization features. Its form styling feature allows users to customize their forms without needing CSS knowledge. However, for those who wish to dive deeper into design, WPForms provides guides on how to style forms using custom CSS. Individual form fields can also be customized, with options including single-line text, paragraph text, and different styles of dropdown menus. 

Templates

Ninja Forms provides a diverse range of field types and customizable form templates. This means that users can build a form that perfectly suits their requirements. Furthermore, Ninja Forms has a collection of file paths. This allows users to create custom templates that don’t already exist within Ninja Forms.

WPForms provides a wide range of pre-made form templates, making it easier for users to create forms that suit their specific needs. The template gallery includes commonly used forms like contact forms, donation forms, order forms, and email signup forms. Furthermore, WPForms allows users to create their form templates, offering a higher degree of customization.

Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

Responsive Design

Ninja Forms is designed to be responsive, adapting to different screen sizes to provide optimal user experience. The responsiveness of Ninja Forms largely depends on the theme’s styling rules, as it inherits the theme’s design elements. If a theme is properly designed for mobile, Ninja Forms will seamlessly integrate and look great on any device.

Similarly, all forms created using WPForms are 100% responsive. They adapt to different screen sizes for optimal viewing and interaction experience. The platform automatically creates responsive multi-column forms that adjust according to the screen size, collapsing into fewer columns for smaller screens. This ensures that forms remain user-friendly and visually appealing across all devices.

Conditional Logic

Ninja Forms’ conditional logic feature provides the ability to create dynamic, interactive forms that react to user input. This feature can show or hide fields, change field values, and selectively send emails based on the information provided by the user. It can even modify lists and offer a more tailored form experience.

WPForms’ smart conditional logic feature offers an advanced way to create dynamic, interactive forms that adapt based on user interaction. This feature enables the showing or hiding of fields, provision of payment choices, and subscription to newsletters depending on user selections. The WPForms builder also supports AND/OR conditional logic, allowing more complex conditions to be set.

Integrations

Ninja Forms and WPForms offer robust integration capabilities with multiple platforms through Zapier. This is a tool that connects your website to over 2,000 web services. These powerful form builders can seamlessly integrate with Google Workspace, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and others.

The integration possibilities with Ninja Forms and WPForms are virtually limitless. 

Real-Time Notifications

Wrapping up our comparison between Ninja Forms vs. WPForms, let’s talk about their real-time notification capabilities.

Ninja Forms’ real-time notifications feature offers various ways to receive instant updates when new form submissions are made. This functionality includes integrations with popular communication platforms like Slack. This allows notifications to be sent directly to the workspace and channel of your choice.

It also supports SMS notifications through ClickSend, providing instant alerts for a faster lead response. Furthermore, Ninja Forms can integrate with Pushover, a service that sends real-time alerts to Android and iOS devices. 

WPForms’ also offers real-time notifications. The notification settings within WPForms are highly customizable, enabling users to choose where email notifications are sent. Users can set up multiple notifications and apply conditional logic and smart tags for complex scenarios.

Additionally, WPForms supports push notifications through plugins like PushEngage. This expands the way users can receive updates about form submissions.

Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

Fill: The Best Alternative To Ninja Forms

When choosing a reliable platform for your business, it’s essential to consider not just the pricing but also the robust features available. This is where Fill emerges as a compelling alternative to Ninja Forms.

One of the standout features of Fill is its military-grade 256-bit encryption. This level of security ensures that your data remains safe and secure, which might not be guaranteed with Ninja Forms. With Fill, you can rest easy knowing that your data is protected by the highest level of security possible.

Additionally, unlike Ninja Forms, which relies on integration for eSignature capabilities, Fill has built-in eSignature functionality. This feature simplifies collecting legally binding signatures. Fill is an excellent choice for businesses that regularly deal with contracts or other formal agreements.

Furthermore, Fill offers unlimited templates that cater to various use cases. This is an advantage over Ninja Forms, which does not explicitly offer unlimited template usage. With Fill, you can create and customize forms to suit any need.

Experience unparalleled security and convenience with Fill. Sign up for a free trial today.

Andria Pacina

Related Stories

PDFsam vs. Adobe Acrobat Pro

PDFsam vs. Adobe Acrobat Pro

The main difference between PDFsam and Adobe Acrobat Pro lies in cloud storage and mobile compatibility. PDFsam lacks cloud storage and mobile apps. In contrast, Adobe Acrobat Pro offers cloud storage and robust mobile compatibility.

SmallPDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

SmallPDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

The main difference between SmallPDF and Adobe Acrobat is on the features they carry. While some features are unavailable on SmallPDF, these are offered by Adobe Acrobat. Thus, it's important to compare these two tools to pick out the option that fits your needs. Let's dive in.

Foxit vs. Bluebeam

Foxit vs. Bluebeam

The main difference between Foxit and Bluebeam lies in their user interface. Foxit is more user-friendly, while Bluebeam has more advanced features and a steeper learning curve. Foxit offers an easy navigation experience, while Bluebeam caters to users needing advanced PDF editing.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up