Koofr vs. Dropbox

The main difference between Koofr and Dropbox is pricing and storage capacities. Koofr offers a free plan with up to 10GB of storage space, while Dropbox’s free plan only provides 2GB. For paid plans, Dropbox generally offers more storage space options than Koofr.

Keep reading for a detailed comparison of Koofr vs Dropbox.

Comparing Koofr and Dropbox


Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage


Custom Branding









Google Workspace, Microsoft Office, and more.


Free/Starts at €0.5 per month








Google Workspace, Adobe, Microsoft Office, Slack, Salesforce, and more.


Free/Starts at $9.99 per month

Storage Capacity

To grasp the distinct features of Koofr and Dropbox, it’s crucial to assess their individual storage capabilities first.

Koofr offers a variety of storage plans to suit different needs. The storage capacity ranges from 10GB, free for life, to 20TB for paid plans. Users can get additional free space by inviting friends to join Koofr, with each friend bringing 2GB of additional free storage. Furthermore, Koofr has a 1TB lifetime plan. There are no individual file size limits and no file type limits.

Dropbox provides 2GB of storage in its free Basic plan. Its paid plans offer storage capacities ranging from 2TB for the Plus plan to custom solutions for the Enterprise plan. 


Koofr has several security features in place to help keep files safe. These include strong password protection and two-factor authentication (2FA) for added account security. Koofr also offers the ability to remotely log out of an account. Additionally, a feature called Koofr Vault lets users add client-side encrypted folders to their cloud storage that cannot be accessed without their permission. There’s even a suggestion for adding a biometric security feature.

As a Koofr alternative, Dropbox also features robust security. It’s designed with multiple layers of protection, which include secure data transfer, encryption, network configuration, and application-level controls. Files stored on Dropbox are encrypted using the 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), a highly secure method for data protection. Additionally, Dropbox uses Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) for secure data transfer. 

Koofr vs. Dropbox

Compliance Standards

As a European cloud storage service, Koofr is compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which ensures data protection and privacy for individuals in the European Union. The company stores user data in highly secure data centers across the EU, in line with EU privacy laws.

Dropbox is compliant with several important standards and regulations. These include ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, HITECH, NIST 800, and the Cloud Security Alliance’s guidelines for security and trust. Dropbox also ensures compliance with GDPR regulations, even for basic or free accounts. Moreover, Dropbox provides detailed controls-based assurance through its SOC 2 report.

Reliability and Uptime

Koofr has been praised for its reliability and uptime. It is described as one of the most stable storage services suitable for companies venturing into the area of cloud storage. Users have also mentioned that access to files is reliable, which is crucial for any cloud-based storage system.

Dropbox is also known for its high reliability and uptime. The company has committed to a 99.9% uptime Service Level Agreement (SLA), indicating its dedication to maintaining consistent access to its services. They conduct regular risk assessments to ensure this level of reliability. Users have also reported strong connectivity and no issues with access, even on free accounts.

Koofr vs. Dropbox

Backup and Recovery

Koofr provides backup and recovery services. It enables users to back up all media files from mobile devices and two-way synchronization from computers without limits. In addition, Koofr supports the restoration of backups using tools such as Duplicati, UpdraftPlus for WordPress backups, and Rustic, an open-source command-line tool.

Similarly, Dropbox offers backup and recovery services. It includes a feature called Dropbox Backup that allows users to back up their files, photos, and videos to the cloud. This backup is available in all Dropbox plans. Depending on the plan, users can restore deleted files and folders from their backup for up to 30 or 180 days.

Pricing and Plans

As we conclude our comparison of Koofr vs Dropbox, let’s now turn our attention to the matter of their pricing structures.

Koofr offers various pricing plans for its cloud storage services. Their monthly plans start from free-to-use to as low as €0.5 for 10GB in the ‘Briefcase’ plan and go up to €20 for 2.5TB in the ‘Crate’ plan. They also offer lifetime subscriptions for certain storage capacities. A lifetime subscription for 1TB of Koofr cloud storage is typically available for $159.99 but often goes on sale for $119.97.

Dropbox also offers a variety of pricing plans suitable for different needs. For personal use, the ‘Free’ plan is ideal. The ‘Plus’ plan is also available at $9.99 per month and provides 2TB of storage. The ‘Professional’ plan costs $19.99 monthly and offers 3TB of storage. For teams, there’s the ‘Standard’ plan at $15 per user per month and the ‘Advanced’ plan at $25 per user per month, both billed annually.

Fill: An eSigning and Robusut Alternative to Koofr

While Koofr offers solid cloud storage services, it’s worth noting that there are versatile platforms out there. Despite primarily being an eSignature platform, Fill can serve as a robust alternative to Koofr for several reasons.

Fill is an acclaimed eSignature and contract management software designed to work online and on any device. It sets itself apart with functionalities, including signature requests and the design and deployment of customizable, reusable templates and online forms for effortless data collection and contract lifecycle management.

More impressively, Fill goes beyond just storage and functionality; it offers military-grade security and HIPAA compliance, providing an extra layer of security that may not be present with Koofr.

In this way, Fill raises the bar, offering a comprehensive, secure, and user-friendly solution for eSignature and data storage needs.

Unlock secure and seamless document management with Fill. Book a demo today.

Amara Chiaha

Amara is a copywriter at Amplify Ventures who uses her experience with UX writing to provide relevant content structure for clients exploring HIPAA compliant document management solutions.

Related Stories

Egnyte vs Sharefile

Egnyte vs ShareFile

The main difference between Egnyte and ShareFile lies in how they approach real-time collaboration and document management. ShareFile excels at sharing files securely and keeps controls in place. Egnyte flawlessly integrates with popular collaboration applications such as Microsoft Office 365 and Google Workspace, lending a competitive edge in the Egnyte vs ShareFile face-off.

ShareFile vs. Google Drive

The main difference between ShareFile and Google Drive lies in their targeted user bases. ShareFile is more suited for businesses needing secure file sharing. Google Drive, on the other hand, caters to a broader audience with its free storage and easy collaboration through integrated Google Workspace apps.

iDrive vs. Dropbox

iDrive vs. Dropbox

The main difference between iDrive and Dropbox lies in their collaboration tool offerings. iDrive allows you to share files using a public link and upholds synchronization across multiple devices. Dropbox provides a more sophisticated suite that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.