Icertis vs. Ironclad

Icertis vs. Ironclad

The main difference between Icertis and Ironclad lies in their target market size. Icertis primarily caters to larger enterprises. On the other hand, Ironclad mostly serves small to medium businesses, up to large enterprises.

This article takes a closer look at the notable distinctions between Icertis vs. Ironclad.

Comparing Icertis vs. Ironclad

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Icertis

Windows

Mac

iOS

Android

SaaS/Web

Yes

Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Custom Plans

Ironclad

Windows

Mac

iOS

Android

SaaS/Web

Yes

Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Custom Plans

 

Audit Trails and Logs

To start our in-depth comparison of Icertis vs. Ironclad, let’s begin with audit trails and logs.

Icertis offers robust audit trail and logging capabilities. Its automated document tracking capabilities can monitor adherence to contract terms, commitments, and various contractual obligations. Furthermore, the platform features configurable risk assessment models. They can automatically evaluate risk levels when contracts are modified or when external data undergoes changes. 

Similarly, Ironclad offers audit trails and logging features that provide a robust tracking and monitoring system for contract management. The platform automatically records and logs all critical actions and changes related to contracts.

Mobile And Other Device Access

Icertis provides accessibility across a range of devices and operating systems. Users can seamlessly access the platform on Windows and Mac computers, allowing for desktop access regardless of the operating system. Additionally, Icertis ensures mobility by offering dedicated applications for both iOS and Android devices.

Like Icertis, Ironclad is accessible on Windows and Mac computers for desktop access. Ironclad also offers dedicated applications for both iOS and Android devices. These ensure users can efficiently manage their contracts, access audit trails, and handle contract-related tasks.

Reporting and Analytics

Icertis’ reporting and analytics offer user-friendly and actionable insights. This enhances visibility into performance metrics throughout the entire contract lifecycle. It includes negotiation, approval, performance monitoring, and contract expiry/renewal. These insights empower users to discover new avenues for value creation within your contract management processes.

Ironclad Insights equips users with contract analytics. It offers a range of prebuilt and customizable charts for effortless contract data reporting. Furthermore, users can easily export and share these charts as images, PDFs, or CSV files. This feature streamlines their data-driven decision-making process.

Icertis vs. Ironclad

Customizable Branding

Icertis provides a range of powerful tools for contract management and compliance. However, custom branding features are not a part of its platform. 

Meanwhile, Ironclad offers custom branding features that enable users to personalize their contract management experience. Users can incorporate their company logo and primary and secondary colors into the platform’s branding settings. This customization extends to email templates, allowing users to transition from Ironclad’s default branding to their company’s brand.

Bulk Signing Capability

Icertis allows users to select multiple contracts, often in a batch or group, and initiate the signing process all at once. This is particularly useful when dealing with many similar or repetitive contracts.

Similarly, Ironclad empowers administrators to efficiently handle a multitude of contracts within the platform’s repository. This feature is particularly beneficial for administrators who must take simultaneous actions on numerous contracts.

Team Collaboration

Icertis’ Collaboration Portal App offers third-party parties online access to contracts. This allows them to submit redlines, review and update contracts, upload compliance documentation, and manage obligations. This approach streamlines communication with suppliers and customers, ensures compliance, and enhances visibility in contract transactions.

Ironclad empowers organizations by extending control and access throughout the company beyond just the legal department. This digital contracting platform enables seamless collaboration across various departments, from procurement and HR to sales. This streamlines the contract process and fosters effective cross-functional teamwork.

Notifications and Reminders

Concluding our comparison between Icertis vs. Ironclad, let’s explore notifications and reminders.

Icertis offers a notification system that covers various events in the contract lifecycle management process. Users can customize notification templates to specify the format and content of email alerts for specific events. Proactive alerts are sent for critical contract dates, including expiration, milestone deliverables, and key obligation events.

In Ironclad, participants in a workflow, whether as the owner, reviewer, or signer, receive notifications. These notifications are accessible on the notifications page within the platform. If someone mentions a person in a comment, sends a reminder, or assigns an action, they’ll receive both an in-app notification and an email notification.

Icertis vs. Ironclad

Fill: The Best Alternative to Icertis

When finding the next and best alternative to Icertis, Fill shines as a standout choice.

First, one of Fill’s standout features is its smart document scanner, transforming Android or iOS phones into a portable scanner for quick PDF scanning, signing, and sharing. This convenience is not found or advertised in Icertis.

Moreover, what sets Fill apart is its versatility, catering to businesses of all sizes. This includes small to medium enterprises and larger corporations. While Icertis primarily targets larger enterprises, Fill’s flexibility and affordability make it a perfect fit for a broad range of business needs.

Furthermore, Fill offers a valuable free trial, allowing users to explore its capabilities without commitment. This feature is notably absent in Icertis.

Make the smart choice with Fill. Sign up for a free account today. 

Andria Pacina

Andria is a seasoned content writer, specializing in document management solutions and HIPAA compliance, providing valuable insights for businesses and professionals alike.

Related Stories

PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

The main difference between PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro is the latter's advanced features and user-friendly interface. Nitro excels in text editing, merging, annotation, watermarking, and OCR. Conversely, PDF-Xchange is more economical, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.

PDF24 vs. Foxit

PDF24 vs. Foxit

The main difference between PDF24 and Foxit is that the former is a free tool to use. Meanwhile, Foxit requires creating an account and paying a monthly fee. Although they are PDF editing tools, some features are better than the other tools. Let's figure out which is the better choice.

PDF-Xchange vs. Foxit

PDF-Xchange vs. Foxit

The main difference between Foxit and PDF-XChange lies in their functionalities: Foxit serves mainly as a PDF reader with editing capabilities, whereas PDF-XChange is a comprehensive PDF editor with an extensive toolset.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up