IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud

ibm cloud vs google cloud

The main difference between IBM Cloud and Google Cloud is their approach to cloud services and specific features. Google Cloud is known for its cloud-first approach and ability to manage and analyze high-performing cloud applications like Cloud Spanner and Big Query. On the other hand, IBM Cloud provides core cloud services and has shifted its focus to marketing a hybrid cloud solution model following the acquisition of RedHat.

Comparing IBM Cloud and Google Cloud

 SecurityAccess Control and User PermissionsReliability and UptimeCostInterface
IBM CloudRobust, scalable, and integrated protection.Flexible and granular permissionsReliable and consistent uptime.Pay-as-you-go Simple and intuitive
Google CloudAdvanced, comprehensive, and AI-enhanced.Customizable, fine-grained securityConsistent uptime and resilient infrastructure.From $6.11 per month.Familiar to Google Users

 

For this IBM Cloud and Google Cloud Comparison, we will be taking a deep dive into each feature and exploring them in detail.

Security

Security is a critical feature of cloud solutions, and both IBM and Google Cloud got the memo.

IBM takes several steps to secure every piece of data it houses. From automatic encryption to a dedicated security team for constant monitoring and even timely security patch implementation. IBM also complies with major global certification and privacy laws, creating a resilient shield against evolving cyber threats.

As an IBM alternative, Google Cloud implements security at every layer of its infrastructure. It includes data encryption in transit and at rest, a private global network, and many more measures.

Google’s approach involves using the same protective measures applied to their in-house services, such as Google Search and YouTube. This strategy protects its data against DDoS attacks, tampering, and fraud. Google also complies with significant international security and privacy standards, sending a clear message about its intent to maintain high-security protocols.

Regarding handling data, both IBM Cloud and Google Cloud follow international data laws carefully. Yet, IBM Cloud may have a slight advantage, especially for businesses in areas with strict data laws. Thanks to IBM’s extensive network of worldwide data centers, customers can dictate where to store their data.

IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud

Reliability and Uptime

IBM Cloud has many data centers worldwide and this allow it to render dependable services and prevent any single failure points.

Google Cloud also has a well-designed network of data centers worldwide which is why it is popular for being a reliable cloud service. Google cloud’s datacenters are designed for redundancy and resiliency to even natural disasters. Google also boasts the capability to live-migrate running VMs between host machines without downtime.

Cost

IBM Cloud uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model. So, you to pay only for the specific resources you use, giving you great flexibility and control over your expenses.

Google Cloud’s costs depend on the service used. Shared-core Virtual Machines like e2-micro, e2-small, and e2-medium have different prices: $6.11/month, $12.23/month, and $24.46/month. These prices are based on CPU cores, RAM, and bandwidth differences.

Google Cloud SQL Server’s costs depend on a few aspects. These include CPU, memory, storage, and networking. Typically, you’ll pay around $0.0413 for each vCPU, $0.0070 for every GB of memory, and $0.170 monthly for each GB of SSD storage.
As for networking pricing for Google Cloud VPS, incoming traffic is free. However, outgoing traffic will cost you between $0.12/GB and $0.23/GB.

User Interface and Ease of Use

When comparing IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud under their interface features, both have a straightforward learning curve. However, specific nuances set them apart.

The IBM Cloud interface is known for its straightforward and user-friendly design. It offers guides, learning materials, and tools for more straightforward system navigation. However, beginners might find it a bit complex because of the wide range of services and features it provides.

Meanwhile, Google Cloud offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those who frequently use Google’s other services. It integrates well with different Google products and has a clean, easy-to-navigate design. However, the long list of services on Google Cloud might seem a bit too much but their clear names and organized information should help reduce any mix-up.

Customer Support

IBM Cloud offers a range of support options, from self-help resources to top-tier packages. Free support includes the extensive IBM knowledge center, online communities, and various study materials.

IBM’s premium plan provides round-the-clock incident reports and dedicated case management. However, there have been instances of irregularities in their technical support.

Meanwhile, Google Cloud boasts a comprehensive online help desk, readily available webinars, and guided learning options. However, depending on the purchased package, the level of support can vary. They provide response times ranging from 15 minutes for urgent issues to 4 hours for less serious matters.

IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud

Mobile Access and Apps Data Sovereignty

There’s a significant difference in the IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud evaluation regarding mobile access.

IBM Cloud has some mobile capabilities, letting you access data and manage systems from anywhere. But it’s not designed with mobile in mind, so it’s not as easy to use on smaller screens as other providers.

Google Cloud stands out in mobile optimization. The Google Cloud console can be easily accessed from any device, no matter where you are. Google also offers efficient mobile apps like Drive and Docs that link smoothly with its system for productivity while moving.

Customization and Branding

When we compare IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud in terms of personalizing and branding, both platforms have pros and cons. You’re probably thinking about this because it helps to align your services with your brand’s look and feel.

As an alternative to Google Cloud, IBM Cloud excels in offering detailed customization options. It’s designed for many industries and allows you to adjust your cloud setup to your needs. Solutions like IBM Cloud Pak let you easily tailor your software and data systems.

Google Cloud, which is part of Google’s services, works well with other existing Google services. So, if you value simplicity over detailed customization, Google Cloud could be your choice.

Audit Trails and Reporting Scalability

With IBM Cloud, you get top-notch audit logging that tracks every account movement. It is helpful as you can quickly see who did what, follow system events, and solve potential problems. It may also interest you to know that IBM Cloud integrates with LogDNA service, which helps you draw meaningful conclusions from your log data.

As an IBM Cloud alternative, Google Cloud comes in strong with its auditing capabilities. It features Cloud Auditing Logs, which records activities within your project via APIs or from admin actions. This feature is critical for monitoring and safeguarding your Google Cloud resources. As for scalability in reporting, Google offers the BigQuery service. This system efficiently handles large amounts of data for real-time reporting, which proves critical for business planning and decision-making.

Fill: The Ultimate Alternative to IBM Cloud

When comparing IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud, it’s clear that both platforms provide many features.

But, if you’re looking for a superior alternative to IBM Cloud, then check out Fill.

Fill offers a mix of cost-effectiveness, adaptability, and a broad range of features, covering the areas where IBM Cloud may not perform as well.

Fill offers excellent customer service and a simple-to-use interface that anyone can manage, even those who are technologically skilled. Fill provides high-quality and secure solutions at a budget-friendly rate, making it an excellent option for all businesses.

Moreover, Fill makes audits and reporting easy, making it a smooth transition from IBM Cloud.

So, if you’re comparing IBM Cloud vs. Google Cloud and searching for another option, Fill is a refined alternative that combines many benefits.

Experience Fill with a free account today!

Amara Chiaha

Amara is a copywriter at Amplify Ventures who uses her experience with UX writing to provide relevant content structure for clients exploring HIPAA compliant document management solutions.

Related Stories

Egnyte vs. FileCloud

Egnyte vs. FileCloud

The main difference between Egnyte and FileCloud lies in the deployment options. While both offer cloud-based solutions, FileCloud also provides on-premise and hybrid cloud options for businesses requiring more data control. Egnyte, however, primarily focuses on its cloud offerings.

SugarSync vs. OneDrive

SugarSync vs. OneDrive

The main difference between SugarSync and OneDrive lies in their collaboration abilities. With SugarSync, you can easily share files and folders, allowing you to choose who can access them. OneDrive, on the other hand, works perfectly with other programs in the Microsoft Office Suite.

iDrive vs. Google Drive

iDrive vs. Google Drive

The main difference between iDrive and Google Drive is their file-sharing capabilities. With iDrive, you are provided with direct links to your files. These links are effortless to share via email, social media, or any other platform. If you frequently use Google Workspace tools like Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides, then Google Drive may be an ideal choice.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up