Plans and Pricing
Developers
Google Cloud is known for its cloud-first approach and ability to manage and analyze high-performing cloud applications like Cloud Spanner and Big Query. On the other hand, IBM Cloud provides core cloud services and has shifted its focus to marketing a hybrid cloud solution model following the acquisition of RedHat.
| Security | Access Control and User Permissions | Reliability and Uptime | Cost | Interface | |
| IBM Cloud | Robust, scalable, and integrated protection. | Flexible and granular permissions | Reliable and consistent uptime. | Pay-as-you-go | Simple and intuitive |
| Google Cloud | Advanced, comprehensive, and AI-enhanced. | Customizable, fine-grained security | Consistent uptime and resilient infrastructure. | From $6.11 per month. | Familiar to Google Users |
Security is a critical feature of cloud solutions, and both IBM and Google Cloud got the memo.
IBM takes several steps to secure every piece of data it houses. From automatic encryption to a dedicated security team for constant monitoring and even timely security patch implementation. IBM also complies with major global certification and privacy laws, creating a resilient shield against evolving cyber threats.
As an IBM alternative, Google Cloud implements security at every layer of its infrastructure. It includes data encryption in transit and at rest, a private global network, and many more measures.
Google’s approach involves using the same protective measures applied to their in-house services, such as Google Search and YouTube. This strategy protects its data against DDoS attacks, tampering, and fraud. Google also complies with significant international security and privacy standards, sending a clear message about its intent to maintain high-security protocols.
Regarding handling data, both IBM Cloud and Google Cloud follow international data laws carefully. Yet, IBM Cloud may have a slight advantage, especially for businesses in areas with strict data laws. Thanks to IBM’s extensive network of worldwide data centers, customers can dictate where to store their data.
IBM Cloud has many data centers worldwide and this allow it to render dependable services and prevent any single failure points.
Google Cloud also has a well-designed network of data centers worldwide which is why it is popular for being a reliable cloud service. Google cloud’s datacenters are designed for redundancy and resiliency to even natural disasters. Google also boasts the capability to live-migrate running VMs between host machines without downtime.
IBM Cloud uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model. So, you to pay only for the specific resources you use, giving you great flexibility and control over your expenses.
Google Cloud’s costs depend on the service used. Shared-core Virtual Machines like e2-micro, e2-small, and e2-medium have different prices: $6.11/month, $12.23/month, and $24.46/month. These prices are based on CPU cores, RAM, and bandwidth differences.
Google Cloud SQL Server’s costs depend on a few aspects. These include CPU, memory, storage, and networking. Typically, you’ll pay around $0.0413 for each vCPU, $0.0070 for every GB of memory, and $0.170 monthly for each GB of SSD storage.
As for networking pricing for Google Cloud VPS, incoming traffic is free. However, outgoing traffic will cost you between $0.12/GB and $0.23/GB.
When comparing IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud under their interface style, both have a straightforward learning curve. However, specific nuances set them apart.
The IBM Cloud interface is known for its straightforward and user-friendly design. It offers guides, learning materials, and tools for more straightforward system navigation. However, beginners might find it a bit complex because of the wide range of services and features it provides.
Meanwhile, Google Cloud offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those who frequently use Google’s other services. It integrates well with different Google products and has a clean, easy-to-navigate design. However, the long list of services on Google Cloud might seem a bit too much but their clear names and organized information should help reduce any mix-up.
IBM Cloud offers a range of support options, from self-help resources to top-tier packages. Free support includes the extensive IBM knowledge center, online communities, and various study materials.
IBM’s premium plan provides round-the-clock incident reports and dedicated case management. However, there have been instances of irregularities in their technical support.
Meanwhile, Google Cloud boasts a comprehensive online help desk, readily available webinars, and guided learning options. However, depending on the purchased package, the level of support can vary. They provide response times ranging from 15 minutes for urgent issues to 4 hours for less serious matters.
When we compare IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud in terms of personalizing and branding, both platforms have pros and cons. You’re probably thinking about this because it helps to align your services with your brand’s look and feel.
As an alternative to Google Cloud, IBM Cloud excels in offering detailed customization options. It’s designed for many industries and allows you to adjust your cloud setup to your needs. Solutions like IBM Cloud Pak let you easily tailor your software and data systems.
Google Cloud, which is part of Google’s services, works well with other existing Google services. So, if you value simplicity over detailed customization, Google Cloud could be your choice.
With IBM Cloud, you get top-notch audit logging that tracks every account movement. It is helpful as you can quickly see who did what, follow system events, and solve potential problems. It may also interest you to know that IBM Cloud integrates with LogDNA service, which helps you draw meaningful conclusions from your log data.
As an IBM Cloud alternative, Google Cloud comes in strong with its auditing capabilities. It features Cloud Auditing Logs, which records activities within your project via APIs or from admin actions. This feature is critical for monitoring and safeguarding your Google Cloud resources. As for scalability in reporting, Google offers the BigQuery service. This system efficiently handles large amounts of data for real-time reporting, which proves critical for business planning and decision-making.
There’s a significant difference in the IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud evaluation regarding mobile access.
IBM Cloud has some mobile capabilities, letting you access data and manage systems from anywhere. But it’s not designed with mobile in mind, so it’s not as easy to use on smaller screens as other providers.
Google Cloud stands out in mobile optimization. The Google Cloud console can be easily accessed from any device, no matter where you are. Google also offers efficient mobile apps like Drive and Docs that link smoothly with its system for productivity while moving.
eSign Stored Documents
Easily share your saved documents for legally binding eSignatures without getting them out of storage.
HIPAA Compliant
Confidently store and share protected health information on a fully HIPAA compliant solution.
Easy to Use
Fill boasts and intuitive interface where first timers can store, share, request eSignatures in 3 minutes
Over 1 million satisfied users.
With an average of 4.6 and 4.9-star ratings on Google Play and Apple App Stores, Fill is the best electronic signature platform for individuals and businesses. It’s an eSignature solution trusted by millions of users.
Choose Fill for additional features on your storage subscription
Start free today and get 2 additional months for free when you upgrade to a paid annual subscription.
|
