Koofr vs. pCloud

The main difference between Koofr and pCloud is how they approach data protection and disaster recovery. Koofr adheres to strict European privacy laws and has an eminently practical system in place to manage your data. On the other hand, pCloud has established a unique ‘pCloud Rewind’ feature, designed to roll back the entire cloud storage to a previous version.

Comparing Koofr and pCloud

 Collaboration ToolsFile Sharing CapabilitiesReliability and UptimeBackup and RecoveryPricing
Koofr YesDirect links and private sharing.High uptime and reliable access.Yes €4.99/month
pCloudYesSecure and encrypted file sharing.Consistent uptime and reliable service.Yes$3.99/month (when billed annually)


Let’s dive in and explore each feature in our Koofr and pCloud comparison.


Koofr employs the highly secure AES 256-bit encryption standard for your files. This way, your files stay that way (encrypted) whether the file is stored or moved. It means even if a breach occurred, your data would be unreadable. 

pCloud offers a unique optional feature known as pCloud Crypto. It provides client-side encryption, meaning you can protect your most confidential files in a “crypto folder.” The encryption keys are only with you, meaning even pCloud can’t access these documents. It’s like having a private vault in your cloud storage.

Koofr vs. pCloud

Access Control and User Permissions

When comparing pCloud vs Koofr, access control and user permission are important features to mention for businesses as they govern who can access, edit, and share files. 

Koofr shines in its detailed approach to user permissions by allowing you to have finely tuned control over permissions. Because of this, Koofr is an excellent choice for businesses that need to control access to sensitive data carefully, as they can decide who views, edits, and shares each file.

On the other hand, pCloud has a simpler yet efficient system for access control. It’s designed for easy use with pre-set roles for users. Although it may pass the smooth user experience check, it is still not a worthy Koofr alternative in terms of detailed permissions control.

It makes pCloud a good choice for individuals or smaller companies who want simple but effective control over their files.

Collaboration Tools

Koofr’s service can be said to boost teamwork as it allows multiple users to work on one folder simultaneously. It also includes a handy feature for commenting on files and streamlining communication. However, it’s worth noting that Koofr lacks real-time document editing, making it lose some points as a pCloud alternative.

Unlike Koofr, pCloud offers real-time document editing due to its connection with Microsoft Office Online and Google Workspace. Additionally, several users can access and share work on the same document thanks to its shared folder system.

Another standout feature of pCloud is the ‘pCloud Rewind’ tool that lets you go back to earlier document versions – a massive plus for group work.

Weighing up Koofr vs pCloud is a tough choice regarding collaboration tools. Your decision might depend on whether real-time editing is a must-have feature for you or if you prefer robust file-sharing and commenting capabilities.

Backup and Recovery

Koofr has a practical system to handle data, tracking all file alterations. If you ever lose data or delete something by mistake, don’t worry. Koofr offers an ‘undo’ feature for data retrieval. But it’s more than just recovery – Koofr ensures your data is safe with zero-knowledge encryption.

pCloud has a ‘pCloud Rewind’ feature that assures you can retrieve files and revert your entire cloud storage to a prior version. It is beneficial if you encounter unforeseen incidents or delete something by mistake. pCloud also allows you to manage your backups better, offering scheduled and manual backup options.

Koofr vs. pCloud

User Interface and Ease of Use

Koofr is designed to be simple and practical. Its user-friendly interface makes it easy to get around, making file management straightforward for all users. Whether you’re tech-savvy or a beginner, Koofr caters to your needs. It even provides a drag-and-drop feature for easy file uploads and management.

As an alternative to Koofr, pCloud offers a user-friendly interface that prioritizes user experience. Its straightforward design allows users to manage and navigate their files easily. pCloud constantly updates its system, adhering to the ever-changing user preferences, offering an impressive, user-focused experience.

Mobile Access and Apps Data Sovereignty

In the Koofr vs pCloud comparison, both have great mobile apps that let you easily access your files anytime, anywhere.

The Koofr mobile app, available for both iOS and Android, is user-friendly. It quickly shares, uploads, and organizes files and syncs with your cloud server to keep your files current. Regarding data sovereignty, Koofr adheres to EU data laws, ensuring your private data is secure.

Meanwhile, pCloud offers a valuable and attractive mobile app. It also includes an auto-upload feature, making it an excellent option for social media and photography users.

As for data control, pCloud is based in Switzerland and is famed for its strong privacy regulations. It assures a safe storage space and adequate data protection for its users.

Customization and Branding

As an alternative to pCloud, Koofr has a simple, straightforward interface with no branding options. It is excellent for individuals or small businesses who want something easy to use. However, larger companies wanting a personal touch may not find what they wish to in Koofr.

On the other hand, pCloud offers an effortless yet customizable experience. It has a user-friendly interface with additional branding options, making it a delight for businesses. This feature allows businesses to sync their cloud storage with their brand style, giving a consistent experience for their users.

So, when comparing Koofr vs pCloud in terms of customization and branding, pCloud seems to have an edge. But remember, the best choice for you would depend on your specific needs and preferences.

Audit Trails and Reporting Scalability

As a pCloud alternative, Koofr offers detailed logs and audit trails. These show you who accessed specific data, when, and from where. This tracking system is ideal in a business environment with many users sharing data.

However, as the amount of users and data rises, Koofr’s reporting becomes less expandable.

pCloud excels in generating detailed reports about user activities and file access. This readily available information can also be scaled up to meet the needs of big businesses or users with heavy data requirements.

Koofr vs. pCloud

Pricing and Plans

Pricing is the major feature difference between Koofr and pCloud

Koofr offers a range of subscription plans to cater to various storage needs. The Starter plan is free and provides 10GB of storage along with features such as unlimited file size, automatic mobile media backup, two-way synchronization, file versioning, enhanced security, a Facebook media transfer tool, and a Save to Koofr browser extension.

As you move up the plans, Briefcase S, Briefcase M, Plus, Suitcase L, Suitcase XL, Suitcase XXL, Suitcase 5XXL, Suitcase 10XXL, and Suitcase 20XXL offer more storage capacities with additional features like private and public sharing, Koofr Vault Safe Boxes, deleted file retention, and external cloud connections, all at varying monthly prices ranging from 0.5 € to 70 €.

pCloud’s Premium plan offers 500GB of storage at $4.99 monthly or $49.99 yearly, while the Premium Plus plan provides 2TB for $9.99 per month or $99.99 yearly.

The Business is best for teams and requires at least three users, offering 1TB storage per user with features like pCloud Crypto and 180-day file versioning. Similarly, the Business Pro plan, designed for teams with at least three users, provides unlimited storage with the same features as the Business plan. Additionally, pCloud offers Lifetime plans for Premium and Premium Plus, allowing users to pay a one-time fee of $175 for unlimited storage and access to all features. 

Fill: A Better Substitute to Koofr

While the features of Koofr and pCloud are great, a HIPAA-compliant cloud document management alternative like Fill is even more interesting. As a powerful competitor to Koofr, Fill offers numerous features that show its excellent performance.

Fill has a price range that fits everyone’s budget better than Koofr. It’s a cost-effective choice for anyone, from single users to large businesses, as you get more bang for your buck with Fill. 

Secondly, Fill stands out for its user-friendliness. The simple interface is easy to use, even if you’re not tech-savvy. So, whether you’re an individual or a business that values simplicity and efficiency, you might prefer Fill.

Fill is also known for its excellent security and adherence to industry compliance. It uses top-level encryption to keep user data safe. Plus, they consistently update their safety measures to protect against new threats.

Try Fill for free today.

Amara Chiaha

Amara is a copywriter at Amplify Ventures who uses her experience with UX writing to provide relevant content structure for clients exploring HIPAA compliant document management solutions.

Related Stories

Internxt vs. Filen

Internxt vs. Filen

The main difference between Internxt and Filen is their approaches to ensuring high-level security. Before leaving your device, Internxt breaks down each file into smaller parts, encoding and distributing them across several servers. Filen assures its users' complete privacy by implementing end-to-end (E2E) encryption, making unauthorized data decryption virtually impossible.

SugarSync vs. OneDrive

SugarSync vs. OneDrive

The main difference between SugarSync and OneDrive lies in their collaboration abilities. With SugarSync, you can easily share files and folders, allowing you to choose who can access them. OneDrive, on the other hand, works perfectly with other programs in the Microsoft Office Suite.

Koofr vs. Internxt

Koofr vs. Internxt

The main difference between Koofr and Internxt lies in integrations. Koofr allows integration with cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive. On the other hand, Internxt does not offer such integrations but focuses more on providing a private cloud storage environment.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.