Icertis vs. Docusign

Icertis vs. Docusign

The main difference between Icertis and DocuSign lies in their core offerings. Icertis specializes in contract lifecycle management. In contrast, DocuSign is primarily known for its electronic signature solution, streamlining the e-signing process.

This article delves deeper into the significant differences between Icertis vs. DocuSign.

Comparing Icertis vs. DocuSign

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Icertis

Windows

Mac

iOS

Android

SaaS/Web

Yes

Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Custom Plans

DocuSign

Windows

Mac

iOS

Android

SaaS/Web

Yes

Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, DropBox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Yes

Starts at

$8 per

month

Compliance

To kick off our comprehensive comparison between Icertis vs. DocuSign, let’s dive into compliance.

Icertis offers features to assist with compliance, such as HIPAA and GDPR. Notably, their GDPR Compliance app facilitates the identification of non-compliant contracts. It simplifies the creation and routing of Data Protection Addendums. It also helps manage processor obligations throughout the contract lifecycle.

Meanwhile, DocuSign ensures HIPAA compliance by acting as a business associate when handling documents containing PHI. Moreover, DocuSign provides customers with additional data processing terms required under GDPR. This includes securing subprocessor protections to meet data protection obligations.

Contract Lifecycle Management

Icertis’ Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) platform offers end-to-end contract management solutions. It streamlines the entire contract lifecycle, from creation and negotiation to execution and compliance monitoring. Icertis CLM enables organizations to centralize, automate, and optimize their contract processes.

On the other hand, DocuSign’s CLM offers quick document generation using templates and a clause library. It also has auto-population from external systems and the establishment of conditional rules and pre-approved clause libraries. It facilitates collaboration and negotiation and streamlines contract workflows with automation.

Additionally, it centralizes contract storage with search and permission controls and utilizes AI and analytics for contract data extraction and insights.

Electronic Signature Integration

Icertis, in partnership with Adobe Sign, offers a comprehensive eSignature solution. This integration streamlines approvals and enhances visibility into the signing process. It also prioritizes security and legal compliance on a global scale. This benefits contract management across diverse domains, from procurement to intellectual property.

DocuSign’s eSignature directly integrates with applications like Salesforce, Microsoft Office 365, and more. This makes it easier to complete transactions and agreements while maintaining compliance with industry standards and regulations.

Icertis vs. Docusign

Document Storage

Icertis provides secure and centralized document storage. It offers a repository to store and organize contract-related documents. It also employs cloud-based storage to maintain up-to-date contract access and synchronization across all devices. This ensures seamless collaboration and consistency among team members.

On the other hand, DocuSign provides document storage by default, and users have the option to set a document retention period. Envelopes with specified retention periods are queued for 14 days, after which the documents within them are permanently deleted from the DocuSign system.

Workflow Automation

Icertis’ workflow automation simplifies the approval process. It boasts dynamic workflow adjustments based on negotiation progress for both sequential and parallel approvals. Notably, it also provides flexibility for manual intervention with ad hoc steps when needed.

DocuSign’s workflow automation enables users to create personalized, professional agreements directly within the platform. It allows senders to input required information within the workflow, which is then dynamically integrated into the original document. Conditional rules within templates can also be set up to control the visibility of content based on the inserted data.

Integrations

To wrap up our analysis of Icertis vs. DocuSign, let’s dive into their integration capabilities.

Icertis excels in its extensive integration capabilities. It seamlessly connects with a wide range of popular software and services, including Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, Zoho, Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, and more.

Similarly, DocuSign is a versatile platform that offers almost the same integrations with the aforementioned software and services. This provides users with a highly flexible and streamlined experience. 

Icertis vs. Docusign

Fill: The Best Alternative to Icertis

When seeking the best alternative to Icertis, Fill proves to be the superior choice. First, Fill boasts an integrated eSignature feature, providing a seamless all-in-one solution for document management and signing. In contrast, Icertis collaborates with Adobe Sign for eSignatures, adding an extra layer of complexity.

Additionally, Fill’s standout feature is its built-in scanner, which allows users to scan and capture documents effortlessly using their mobile phone camera. This feature is absent in Icertis, giving Fill an edge in digitizing document workflows.

Moreover, Fill’s Pro version comes at an incredibly budget-friendly price of just $24.99, making it an ideal solution for small and medium-sized businesses. This affordability, combined with its robust feature set, ensures that Fill is accessible to organizations of all sizes.

Join the ranks of satisfied Fill users. Sign up for a free account today. 

Andria Pacina

Andria is a seasoned content writer, specializing in document management solutions and HIPAA compliance, providing valuable insights for businesses and professionals alike.

Related Stories

Wondershare PDFelement vs. UPDF

Wondershare PDFelement vs. UPDF

The main difference between Wondershare PDFelement vs. UPDF lies in the various tools offered. Wondershare PDFelement excels in providing business-ready features and tools for all around operations. UPDF, on the other hand might be better for a seamless personal usage.

Formidable Forms vs. Gravity Forms

Formidable Forms vs. Gravity Forms

The main difference between Formidable Forms and Gravity Forms can be attributed to their customization levels and survey capabilities. Formidable Forms enables effortless brand-aligned form customization. Gravity Forms excels with its form builder and diverse payment gateway options.

Wondershare PDFelement vs. PDF Expert

Wondershare PDFelement vs. PDF Expert

The main difference between Wondershare PDFelement vs PDF Expert hinges on their array of features and the scope of platform compatibility. While Wondershare PDFelement is more versatile with a range of features, PDF Expert excels in offering refined annotation tools and a one-time payment pricing.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up