Plans and Pricing
Developers
Foxit is more user-friendly, while Bluebeam has more advanced features and a steeper learning curve. Foxit offers an easy navigation experience, while Bluebeam caters to users needing advanced PDF editing.
| Annotation Tools | Template Library | Mobile Compatibility | Cloud Integration | |
| Foxit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bluebeam | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Foxit provides an easy-to-use interface for filling out forms. It allows various input types and features an efficient auto-complete function that recalls and suggests prior entries for quicker input.
On the other hand, we have Bluebeam’s Form Editor, which allows quick creation and editing of form fields. It comes with many tools for form-filling tasks and a user-friendly interface.
Foxit has a straightforward and accessible tool for merging and splitting PDF documents. You only need to upload the files, arrange them in the desired order, choose whether you wish to combine or split, and click Apply.
The software will do all the work on the backend and provide you with a refined merged or split PDF file in no time.
If you want more options for customizing how you want to split or merge your files, consider going for Bluebeam. While it seems more complicated than Foxit, its tools like Batch Link and Slip Sheet allow you more control over your file processing.
With just a few clicks, Foxit lets you add pre-defined text or create custom content to suit your needs. You are provided a preview to ensure your headers and footers appear as desired before you finalize them.
While with Bluebeam, you’ll have plenty of customization options. Aside from the typical header and footer content, Bluebeam also allows you to include file metadata and bookmarks. This feature is best for more complex documents that need a detailed overview that is accessible right from the header or footer.
Foxit provides annotation tools that you can use to easily highlight, underline, strikethrough, and add call-outs, text boxes, notes, and shapes.
Bluebeam, on the other hand, offers advanced annotation tools. You can overlay document versions, sketch quickly, or create custom tools, perfect for a more technical task.
Foxit has a broad template library for various needs. These templates help users create PDF files by easily inserting and arranging pages, forms, and other elements.
For beginners, navigating the many templates in Foxit can be challenging due to the complex search function.
Bluebeam’s template library is similar to Foxit’s but allows for the saving and sharing of toolsets. It is best to have a preferred toolset ready if you’re expecting to deal with similar projects.
In terms of mobile compatibility, Foxit has the edge over Bluebeam. With Foxit, you receive a well-optimized mobile app compatible across different operating systems. The application lets you fill, sign, and annotate PDFs from your mobile device. Its lightweight nature ensures smooth running and less lag or freeze-ups while working. The layout is also user-friendly, providing easy navigation even for first-time users.
Bluebeam also comes with a mobile application, although it is only compatible with iPad, limiting Android and iPhone users. The app is heavier, which may result in slower operation on some devices. One good thing about the app is that it supports cloud integration, making your files accessible from different locations.
You can effortlessly pull in PDFs stored in cloud services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box with Foxit and save them without hassle. All of these without the need to download and re-upload files, making the whole process extremely efficient.
Bluebeam’s cloud integration is more than storage; it is a platform for real-time collaboration. It lets users store their files securely in the cloud and allows multiple users to collaborate on the same document in real-time.
Foxit offers three subscription models. The standard version, which includes basic features suitable for personal use, costs $139 annually. The Business version costs $179 annually. The PhantomPDF Mac, specifically designed for Mac users, is available for $129 annually.
On the other hand, Bluebeam offers a simpler pricing model. Their premium package, Revu, is available in three versions – Standard, CAD, and eXtreme, which cost $349, $449, and $599, respectively. Each version targets different professional needs, with eXtreme being the most comprehensive.
Bluebeam’s expensive packages provide great value in specific professional environments despite the cost. They include features from essential PDF viewing/editing to advanced file creation and markup abilities.
You can reach Foxit through multiple channels for support, such as an online ticket system, email, or telephone. Foxit’s support guides and video tutorial library also offer self-help options for users who prefer figuring things out independently.
Bluebeam offers a similar approach as Foxit when it comes to customer support. Additionally, Bluebeam has a repository of self-help resources. It includes user guides and tutorial videos that you may use if you still need to familiarize yourself with their service.
There is little difference when comparing Foxit vs. Bluebeam as they both provide excellent customer support.
eSign Documents
Quickly edit, fill, and sign PDF documents without navigating through complex menus, unlike other PDF fillers.
Unlimited Storage
Enjoy unlimited storage for your documents in a secure and industry-compliant cloud at $24.99 per month.
Easy to Use
Fill’s intuitive layout keeps its tools and functions readily available and streamlines PDF handling and editing.
Over 1 million satisfied users.
With an average of 4.6 and 4.9-star ratings on Google Play and Apple App Stores, Fill is the best electronic signature platform for individuals and businesses. It’s an eSignature solution trusted by millions of users.
Get a superior PDF and document workflow tool for your team.
Start free today and get 2 additional months for free when you upgrade to a paid annual subscription.
|
