Foxit vs. Bluebeam

Foxit vs. Bluebeam

The main difference between Foxit and Bluebeam lies in their user interface. Foxit is more user-friendly, while Bluebeam has more advanced features and a steeper learning curve. Foxit offers an easy navigation experience, while Bluebeam caters to users needing advanced PDF editing.

In the battle between Foxit vs. Bluebeam, which one is the better option? Read more about these two PDF fillers here.

Comparing Foxit vs. Bluebeam

 

Annotation Tools

Template Library

Mobile Compatibility

Cloud Integration

Foxit

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Bluebeam

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes




Form Filling

Foxit provides an easy-to-use interface for form filling. It allows various input types and features an efficient auto-complete function for quicker input by recalling and suggesting prior entries.

On the other hand, we have Bluebeam’s Form Editor, which allows quick creation and editing of form fields. It comes with many tools for form-filling tasks and a user-friendly interface for ease of use. 

Merge and Split PDF Documents

Foxit has a straightforward and accessible tool for merging and splitting PDF documents. You only need to upload the files, arrange them in the order you want, choose whether you wish to combine or split, and click Apply.

The software will do all the work on the backend and provide you with a refined merged or split PDF file in no time.

If you want more options for customizing how you want to split or merge your files, consider going for Bluebeam. While it seems more complicated than Foxit, its tools like Batch Link and Slip Sheet allow you more control over your file processing. 

Headers and Footers

With just a few clicks, Foxit lets you add pre-defined text or create custom content to suit your needs. You are provided a preview to ensure your headers and footers appear as desired before you finalize them. 

While with Bluebeam, you’ll have plenty of customization options. Aside from the typical header and footer content, Bluebeam also allows you to include file metadata and bookmarks. This feature is best for more complex documents that need a detailed overview accessible right from the header or footer. 

Annotation Tools

Foxit provides annotation tools that you can use to easily highlight, underline, strikethrough, and add call-outs, text boxes, notes, and shapes.

Bluebeam offers advanced annotation tools, on the other hand. You can overlay document versions, sketch quickly, or create custom tools, perfect for a more technical task.

Template Library

Foxit has a broad template library for various needs. These templates help users create PDF files by easily inserting and arranging pages, forms, and other elements.

For beginners, navigating the many templates in Foxit can be challenging due to the complex search function.

Bluebeam’s template library is similar to Foxit’s but allows saving and sharing toolsets. It is best to have a preferred toolset ready if you’re expecting to deal with similar projects.

Mobile Compatibility

Being able to manipulate your PDFs while on the go can enhance your productivity remarkably. When comparing Foxit vs. Bluebeam in terms of mobile compatibility, the former has the edge.

You receive a well-optimized mobile app compatible across different operating systems with Foxit. The application lets you fill, sign, and annotate PDFs from your mobile device. Its lightweight nature ensures smooth running and less lag or freeze-ups while working. The layout is also user-friendly, providing easy navigation even for first-time users.

Bluebeam also comes with a mobile application, although it is only compatible with iPad, limiting Android and iPhone users. The app is heavier, which may result in slower operation on some devices. One good thing about the app is that it supports cloud integration, making your files accessible from different locations. 

Foxit vs. Bluebeam

Cloud Integration

You can effortlessly pull in PDFs stored in cloud services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box with Foxit and save them without hassle. All of these without the need to download and re-upload files, making the whole process extremely efficient. 

Bluebeam’s cloud integration is more than storage; it is a platform for real-time collaboration. It lets users store their files securely in the cloud and allows multiple users to collaborate on the same document in real time. 

Pricing

Foxit offers three subscription models. The standard version, which includes basic features suitable for personal use, comes with an annual cost of $139. The Business version has a yearly fee of $179. The PhantomPDF Mac, specifically designed for Mac users, is available at $129 per year. 

On the other hand, Bluebeam offers a simpler pricing model. Their premium package, Revu, is available in three versions – Standard, CAD, and eXtreme, which cost $349, $449, and $599, respectively. Each version targets different professional needs, with eXtreme being the most comprehensive. 

Despite the cost, Bluebeam’s expensive packages provide great value in specific professional environments. They include features from essential PDF viewing/editing to advanced file creation and markup abilities.

Customer Support

If you’ve ever had a software glitch or technical issue you couldn’t solve, you’ll understand how essential responsive and easy-to-reach customer support is.

You can reach Foxit through multiple channels for support, such as an online ticket system, email, or telephone. Foxit’s support guides and video tutorial library also offer self-help options for users who prefer figuring things out independently.

Bluebeam offers a similar approach as Foxit when it comes to customer support. Additionally, Bluebeam has a repository of self-help resources. It includes user guides and tutorial videos that you may use if you still need to familiarize yourself with their service.

When comparing Foxit vs. Bluebeam, they have little difference as they both provide excellent customer support.

Foxit vs. Bluebeam

Fill: The Best Alternative to Foxit

Are you looking for a simpler alternative to Foxit? Try Fill, a user-friendly and efficient substitute that simplifies working with PDFs. 

Fill’s intuitive layout streamlines PDF handling and editing. Its user-centric design keeps its tools and functions readily available. It allows quick edits, fills, and signatures on PDF documents without navigating through complex menus, unlike other PDF fillers.

Sign up for a FIll account today and get access to a superior PDF tool.

Andria Pacina

Related Stories

WPForms vs. Google Forms

WPForms vs. Google Forms

The main difference between WPForms and Google Forms lies in their integration capabilities. WPForms offers seamless integration with WordPress sites, advanced form fields, and premium support. On the other hand, Google Forms is free and cloud-based. It easily integrates with other Google tools.

Foxit vs. PDF Xchange

Foxit vs. PDF Xchange

The main difference between Foxit and PDF Xchange is their pricing and mobile compatibility. Foxit boasts cost-effective plans for broader users. It also provides enhanced accessibility through mobile versions. In contrast, PDF Xchange pricing is steep and is confined to desktop use only.

Formidable Forms vs. Gravity Forms

Formidable Forms vs. Gravity Forms

The main difference between Formidable Forms and Gravity Forms can be attributed to their customization levels and survey capabilities. Formidable Forms enables effortless brand-aligned form customization. Gravity Forms excels with its form builder and diverse payment gateway options.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up