FormAssembly vs. Microsoft Forms

FormAssembly vs. Microsoft Forms

The main difference between FormAssembly and Microsoft Forms lies in their approach to templates. FormAssembly provides many adjustable templates that allow you to customize your forms. On the other hand, Microsoft Forms prioritizes simplicity, equipping its users with ready-made templates.

Read on to learn more about our Microsoft Forms and FormAssembly comparison.

Comparing FormAssembly and Microsoft Forms

 Conditional LogicWorkflow AutomationCustomer SupportPayment Support
FormAssemblyDynamic form customization toolYesOffers chat and email support for all customers and a Customer Success Manager under their premuim plans.Microsoft Forms does not offer a direct payment processing feature within its forms
Microsoft FormsAdaptive question branchingYesOffers a range of support resources rather than direct customer service.Supports, Chargent, CyberSource, FreshBooks, PayPal, Stripe, and iATS.

User-Friendly Interface

The interface of FormAssembly is user-friendly and straightforward, perfect for beginners. It features a simple drag-and-drop function for effortless form building and customization.

Microsoft Forms also stands out with its simple and sleek user interface. It’s easy to navigate, and its uncomplicated design works well for users at all skill levels. Helpful tooltips are also included, leading users smoothly through the form-building process.

Your choice between Microsoft Forms vs FormAssembly should revolve around your unique needs and preferences for a user-friendly interface.


Both FormAssembly and Microsoft Forms provide various templates, but they differ significantly in their design approach.

FormAssembly offers many adjustable templates, allowing you to tailor your forms to your brand or specific requirements.

In contrast, Microsoft Forms emphasizes simplicity with ready-made templates. Designed to speed up form creation, Microsoft Forms may have fewer customization options than FormAssembly. However, its templates are user-friendly and easy to use.

Responsive Design

FormAssembly stands out with its user-friendly design that works well on desktops, tablets, and mobile devices. Quickly adjusting to different screens dramatically improves user experience and accessibility.

While Microsoft Forms supports responsive design, it’s not as customizable as FormAssembly. It works well on various devices, but the user interface isn’t as flexible. Although it offers reasonable responsiveness, it may not be as easy or adaptable as FormAssembly offers.

FormAssembly vs. Microsoft Forms

Conditional Logic

The conditional logic feature in FormAssembly offers a wide array of options. It allows you to set conditions for fields, sections, and pages so your form responds to user input. This adaptability suits complicated forms like thorough surveys or in-depth feedback.

Microsoft Forms provides a more straightforward approach to conditional logic, offering branching scenarios influenced by previous responses. Despite being less complex than FormAssembly, Microsoft Forms’ conditional logic effectively caters to most form requirements. It mainly prioritizes user-friendliness and simplicity.

Real-Time Notifications

One key feature stands out when we compare FormAssembly vs Microsoft Forms: real-time notifications.

FormAssembly keeps you in the loop with email alerts for form submissions. It enhances user experience by sending automated emails to those who’ve filled out your form. This way, you can quickly respond to your respondents’ needs.

On the other hand, Microsoft Forms takes a unique approach. While it doesn’t provide in-built real-time notifications, it integrates effortlessly with Microsoft Power Automate.

Using Power Automate, you can set up a workflow for email notifications when a form is submitted, assigning tasks to the right individuals. It effectively transforms a potential downside into a beneficial characteristic.

Spam Protection

Through the use of CAPTCHA verification, FormAssembly ensures solid spam protection. This feature is crucial for safeguarding user data and preserving the accuracy of the collected responses.

As a FormAssembly alternative, Microsoft Forms employs an intelligent AI system. It sifts through responses, spots patterns linked to spam or bots, and rules them out. The system keeps improving, ensuring you only get relevant and handy data, free of junk.

Reporting and Analytics

When comparing the feature of reporting and analytics in FormAssembly vs Microsoft Forms, there are certain aspects you should be aware of.

As an alternative to Microsoft Forms, FormAssembly offers you a reporting tool that simplifies data analysis. It has features like data exporting and graphics for easy data visualization. You can create assorted reports to understand user responses and behavior better.

Microsoft Forms offers real-time visual response categorization, making interpretation easier. You can further analyze your data by exporting it to Excel. Despite being less sophisticated than FormAssembly, Microsoft Forms effectively comprehends and scrutinizes your form’s data.

Payment Support

FormAssembly stands out for connecting with payment processors like PayPal, Stripe, and Its diverse options make it a prime choice for businesses focused on eCommerce and online transactions.

Unlike FormAssembly, Microsoft Forms doesn’t provide direct payment support, which might restrict its usefulness for some businesses.

FormAssembly vs. Microsoft Forms

Fill: The Best Alternative To FormAssembly

If FormAssembly got your attention, it’s beneficial also to consider another helpful tool: Fill.

Within minutes, thanks to its user-friendly, drag-and-drop interface, you can create attractive forms without needing any coding skills. There’s no technical expertise required, allowing you to concentrate more on creating effective forms that attract responses and less on navigating the software.

Feedback is crucial for any business. With Fill, you can effortlessly gather customer feedback via a digital platform. Customer queries, suggestions, or concerns can be collected in less than 10 minutes.

Fill offers the added advantage of efficiently reusing digital forms. You can quickly send them to numerous respondents, simplifying data collection. It makes Fill a sustainable solution for creating forms.

Remember, for a form to be successful, it needs to be accessible and user-friendly. That’s why Fill emphasizes mobile-friendly forms, allowing you to connect with your audience anytime, anywhere. They effectively cater to a diverse range of digital habits.

Fill is a robust data survey tool essential for making strategic business decisions. Providing in-depth and detailed data collection renders insightful information key to elevating your brand’s visibility amid business competition.

Try out Fill’s numerous features by signing up for a free account today.

Andria Pacina

Related Stories

Nitro PDF vs. Foxit

Nitro PDF vs. Foxit

The main difference between NitroPDf and Foxit lies in their eSignature and mobile capabilities. Nitro PDF offers e-signatures but lacks a dedicated mobile app for Android. Foxit PDF Editor not only includes an eSignature function but also provides mobile apps for both Android and iOS devices.

SurveySparrow vs. SurveyMonkey

SurveySparrow vs. SurveyMonkey

The main difference between SurveySparrow and SurveyMonkey centers around their approach to templates. SurveySparrow is remarkable for its modern, conversational-style templates. Uniquely, it has the power to transform routine surveys into engaging dialogues.

Wondershare PDFelement vs. Xodo

Wondershare PDFelement vs. Xodo

The main difference between Wondershare PDFelement vs. Xodo lies in the features they offer. Some features are not available on the other, which makes one a better choice. Let’s look at these differences in this comparison guide.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.