Soda PDF vs. Nitro PDF

Soda PDF vs. Nitro PDF

The main difference between Soda PDF and Nitro PDF is that the former is cloud-based, while the latter is a computer-installed PDF editor. Soda PDF is accessible from anywhere with an internet connection. Nitro PDF, conversely, is locally installed, requiring installation on the user’s computer.

Comparing Soda PDF vs. Nitro PDF

 

Platforms Supported

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Soda PDF

Desktop – Windows, Mac, Cloud, SaaS, Web-Based

Dropbox, OneDrive, Box, SharePoint, Office 365, and more

Yes

Starts at $11.30 per month

Nitro PDF

Desktop – Windows, Mac

Microsoft Office, Google Drive, Dropbox, Evernote, and more

Yes

Starts at $159.99 per year

 

Form Filing

Soda PDF prioritizes simplicity, making it a suitable choice for users seeking a straightforward solution. Soda PDF’s Form Wizard aids form creation, allowing text fields, checkboxes, and dropdown menus for user-friendly form completion.

In contrast, Nitro PDF provides advanced features and customization, addressing the needs of users with more intricate PDF form requirements. It allows extensive customization of form fields and includes eSignature functionality for electronic form signing.

Text Editing

Soda PDF provides basic, user-friendly text editing for simple adjustments like adding, deleting, or modifying PDF content. It also permits font style, size, color, and formatting changes.

Nitro PDF excels with advanced text editing, precise font control, table editing, redaction, and collaboration features. Ideal for complex documents, offering reflowing text, paragraph reordering, and advanced content manipulation.

Merge and Split PDF Documents

Soda PDF suits basic merging and splitting needs, allowing the combination of multiple documents with a straightforward interface. However, it may lack extensive customization for splits.

In contrast, Nitro PDF excels in advanced merging and versatile splitting, accommodating specific and complex requirements by rearranging pages.

Export and Convert PDF Files

Soda PDF simplifies exporting and converting PDFs into common formats. It provides standard choices like images and editable text. Soda PDF provides standard conversion options like turning PDFs into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or image formats.

In contrast, Nitro PDF excels in accurate, diverse conversions, reducing post-conversion formatting for complex student needs across various formats. Nitro PDF provides more advanced and accurate PDF to Word, Excel, and PowerPoint conversions.

Soda PDF vs. Nitro PDF

Annotation Tools

Soda PDF offers basic annotation tools like highlights, underlines, strikethroughs, and text comments, along with sticky notes. The annotation options are straightforward and may not include advanced features.

Nitro PDF offers full annotation tools, fostering collaboration with highlights, underlines, comments, shapes, stamps, and digital signatures. It also includes measurement tools for distance and area, particularly useful for technical or engineering documents.

Password Protection

Soda PDF is apt for basic password protection with user-friendly features and standard 128-bit AES encryption.

In contrast, Nitro PDF offers advanced security, including certificate-based protection, detailed permissions control, and strong 256-bit AES encryption. You can specify user actions like printing or modifying.

Template Library

Soda PDF’s template library offers pre-designed templates, allowing customization for documents like resumes, invoices, business cards, and more. 

Nitro PDF’s Template Library provides a wide array of templates catering to various document needs, allowing extensive branding and content adjustments. You can extensively customize the templates to match your requirements, allowing for significant branding and content adjustments.

File Size and Limitations

Soda PDF sets limits at 100 MB for the free version, which expands to 500 MB in the paid version. Nitro PDF, in contrast, does not impose any file size limitations. This is particularly valuable for users regularly dealing with large PDF files.

Cloud Integration

Soda PDF integrates with cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. Nitro PDF, on the other hand, pairs with Nitro Cloud. This feature is indispensable for users needing seamless access and document sharing across multiple platforms.

Pricing

Pricing for Soda PDF and Nitro PDF can fluctuate based on specific plans and editions. Soda PDF presents a more budget-friendly option, starting at $6 per month. Nitro PDF, in contrast, involves a one-time payment of $159.99. This pricing aspect holds significant weight for users operating within budget constraints.

Soda PDF vs. Nitro PDF

Fill: The Best Alternative to Soda PDF

When it comes to PDF editors, Fill is an exceptional pick. Fill offers a rich feature set encompassing form filling, text editing, and proficient file exporting and conversion. 

Fill has an innovative and user-friendly interface, surpassing the complexities of Nitro PDF and exceeding the accessibility of Soda PDF. No matter your platform, be it Windows, Mac, iOS, or Android, Fill delivers on all fronts.

Fill’s pricing is particularly budget-conscious, kicking off at a mere $8.33 monthly, which is undeniably wallet-friendly. In contrast, consider Nitro PDF, which comes with a significant one-time cost of $159.99. The disparity is evident, and this is why users mindful of their budgets are gravitating towards Fill.

Fill excels as the top choice for users seeking a dependable and cost-effective alternative. It provides an economical and trustworthy option in place of Soda PDF and Nitro PDF.

Andria Pacina

Andria is a seasoned content writer, specializing in document management solutions and HIPAA compliance, providing valuable insights for businesses and professionals alike.

Related Stories

Typeform vs. Paperform

Typeform vs. Paperform

The main difference between Typeform and Paperform lies in their approach to form creation. Typeform is known for its sleek and interactive forms that have a conversational interface. On the other hand, Paperform focuses on a flexible platform for creating forms with a more traditional feel.

Foxit vs. Adobe Reader

Foxit vs. Adobe Reader

The main difference between Foxit and Adobe Reader is their pricing and features. Foxit offers cost-effective plans and advanced features like content redaction and page control. Conversely, Adobe Reader provides a robust free version for basic tasks but requires Pro version for advanced features.

Xodo vs. Foxit

Xodo vs. Foxit

The main difference between Xodo and Foxit is defined by their unique feature sets, user customization, and approach to document security and management. Foxit places a premium on user customization and document security, while Xodo emphasizes swift document processing and seamless integrations.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up