PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

The main difference between PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro is the latter’s advanced features and user-friendly interface. Nitro excels in text editing, merging, annotation, watermarking, and OCR. Conversely, PDF-Xchange is more economical, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.

Comparing PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

 Platform SupportedCloud StorageIntegrationsCustom BrandingPrice
PDF X-changeWindowsYesNone mentionedNoFree
NitroWindowsYesMicrosoft Office, Dropbox, OneDrive, Box, Google Drive, Evernote, and moreYesStarts from $9.99/month per user

Form Filling

Form filling is a crucial feature for PDF fillers. It allows users to fill out forms electronically, saving time and effort. PDF-Xchange and Nitro both offer form-filling capabilities. Nitro has a more intuitive interface, making it easier for users to fill out forms quickly and accurately. Nitro also has more advanced form-filling features, such as the ability to create and edit PDF forms.

Text Editing

Text editing is another important feature for PDF fillers. It allows users to edit text in PDF documents, making it easier to correct errors and make changes. PDF-Xchange and Nitro both offer text editing capabilities.

Nitro has more advanced text editing features, such as the ability to edit text in scanned documents using OCR technology. On the other hand, Nitro also has more advanced formatting options, such as the ability to change font size and style.

Merge & Split PDF Documents

Merging and splitting PDF documents is a common task for users who work with PDF files. PDF-Xchange and Nitro both allow users to merge and split PDF documents.

Nitro has a more user-friendly interface for these tasks, making it easier for users to manage their PDF files. Nitro also has more advanced merging and splitting options, such as the ability to merge multiple PDF files into a single document.

Export and Convert PDF Files

It allows users to convert PDF files to other formats, such as Microsoft Office formats. PDF-Xchange and Nitro both allow users to export and convert PDF files but they differ when it comes to extents. Nitro has more advanced export and conversion features, such as the ability to convert PDF files to HTML and image formats.

Headers and Footers

Headers and footers are important for branding and document organization. Both PDF-Xchange and Nitro allow users to add headers and footers to their PDF documents. Nitro has more advanced header and footer customization options, such as the ability to add page numbers and custom text.

Annotation Tools

PDF-Xchange and Nitro both offer annotation tools. Nitro has more advanced annotation tools, such as the ability to add stamps and signatures. Nitro also has more advanced commenting features, such as the ability to reply to comments and track changes.

Watermarking

Watermarking is important for users who need to protect their PDF documents from unauthorized use. Both PDF-Xchange and Nitro allow users to add watermarks to their PDF documents. Nitro has more advanced watermarking options, such as the ability to add custom watermarks and adjust opacity.

PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

Template Library

A template library is a collection of pre-designed templates that users can use to create professional-looking PDF documents. This makes it easier to create or make files. Nitro has a template library that allows users to choose from a variety of pre-designed templates for their PDF documents. PDF-Xchange does not offer this feature.

Redaction

Redaction is important for users who need to remove sensitive information from their PDF documents. Both PDF-Xchange and Nitro allow users to redact sensitive information from their PDF documents. Nitro has more advanced redaction features, such as the ability to search for and redact specific words or phrases.

Password Protection

When it comes to password protection, both PDF-Xchange and Nitro allow users to password protect their PDF documents. Nitro has more advanced password protection features, such as the ability to set different levels of password protection for different users.

User Interface

User interface is important for users who need to navigate and use the software easily. Nitro has a more user-friendly interface than PDF-Xchange, making it easier for users to navigate and use the software. Nitro also has more advanced customization options, such as the ability to customize the toolbar and keyboard shortcuts.

Signature Integration

 Both PDF-Xchange and Nitro allow users to add digital signatures to their PDF documents. Nitro has more advanced signature integration features, such as the ability to create and save custom signatures.

Customer Support

Customer support is important for easy troubleshooting. Both PDF-Xchange and Nitro offer excellent customer support. However, Nitro has more advanced customer support options, such as live chat and phone support.

PDF-Xchange vs. Nitro

Fill: The Best Alternative to PDF-Xchange

Fill stands out as a premier cloud-based solution compared to PDF-Xchange and Nitro, boasting an array of unique features. Users have the flexibility to create, modify, and digitally sign PDFs online without the hassle of software installations. Its innovative PDF Autofill tool streamlines form completions, minimizing tedious manual entries.

Fill further simplifies online PDF form interactions, supporting elements such as text fields, check boxes, and dropdowns. Security is paramount with Fill; it employs robust encryption and ensures data compliance with international standards. Designed for efficiency, its intuitive interface seamlessly handles tasks from editing to signing.

Overall, with its cloud prowess, autofill capabilities, and robust security, Fill emerges as the top contender for online PDF activities.

Andria Pacina

Andria is a seasoned content writer, specializing in document management solutions and HIPAA compliance, providing valuable insights for businesses and professionals alike.

Related Stories

Formstack vs. Google Forms

Formstack vs. Google Forms

The main difference between Formstack and Google Forms lies in their features and integrations. Formstack simplifies online form creation, assisting digital marketers in collecting data and payment. Google Forms, a tool within Google Apps for Work, allows users to collect data via surveys.

Typeform vs. Paperform

Typeform vs. Paperform

The main difference between Typeform and Paperform lies in their approach to form creation. Typeform is known for its sleek and interactive forms that have a conversational interface. On the other hand, Paperform focuses on a flexible platform for creating forms with a more traditional feel.

Juro vs. DocuSign

Juro vs. DocuSign

The main difference between Juro and DocuSign lies in the device accessibility. Juro provides a mobile-ready interface but lacks mobile applications. On the other hand, DocuSign offers a mobile app available for iOS, Android, and Windows.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up