Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

The main difference between Nitro PDF and Adobe Acrobat lies in mobile compatibility. Nitro PDF provides powerful tools but lacks Android integration. Adobe Acrobat excels in this aspect, offering comprehensive PDF tools for both Android and iOS devices.

In this article, we will explore the other major differences between Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat.

Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat Comparison

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Nitro PDF

Mac

iPhone

iPad

Yes

Microsoft Word, Power Automate, and Salesforce

Yes

Starts at

$9.99 per

month

Adobe Acrobat

Windows

Mac

Android

iOS

SaaS/Web

Yes

Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and Microsoft apps

Yes

Starts at

$20 per month




User Interface

Nitro PDF’s user interface offers smart, efficient, and flexible solutions for your document workflow. It provides tools for PDF productivity, eSignatures, document generation, and identity services. Additionally, Nitro PDF includes full access to API developer features without any extra charges.

Adobe Acrobat’s user interface enables you to perform a variety of tasks with PDFs. You can create new PDFs, make edits, and review documents. Plus, Adobe Acrobat supports team collaboration, making it a versatile, all-in-one platform for working with PDFs.

Security

With Nitro PDF, you can secure your files using two methods: password-based and certificate-based security. Passwords limit access and file actions based on the password’s strength and permissions like open and permission passwords. Certificate-based security offers benefits like no password memorization. Digital IDs and security settings are also available for each recipient.

Adobe Acrobat emphasizes two key security aspects. First is application security, which defends the software from vulnerabilities and attacks. The other is content security, which preserves PDF integrity and data privacy. Also, application security customization is possible through the user interface and registry configurations for enterprise administrators.

Signature Integration

Nitro PDF provides eSignature functionality through QuickSign. This tool guarantees document confidentiality and integrity. This makes it a useful option for electronic document signing.

Adobe Acrobat offers eSignature capabilities. Acrobat Sign includes simple tools for quick document signing as well as more sophisticated functionality. The signature process is made more effective by the inclusion of form templates and bulk emailing.

Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

Mobile Compatibility

Nitro PDF offers a dedicated app for iPad and iPhone systems, ensuring accessibility on iOS devices. It supports standard deployment methods and system requirements. These make it quick and easy to manage Nitro PDF in large enterprises.

On the other hand, Adobe Acrobat provides dedicated mobile apps for both Android and iOS devices. These apps ensure that users can access and work with their PDF documents seamlessly on their smartphones and tablets. 

Create, Convert, and Edit PDF Files

With Nitro PDF, you may convert web material into PDF files. You may also use it to combine numerous files and create new PDFs. It also offers capabilities for modifying text and graphics, dealing with forms, annotating PDFs, and comparing them.

For straightforward PDF tasks, Adobe Acrobat serves as an all-in-one platform. It has tools for creating, editing, and converting PDFs. Additionally, you may swiftly sign papers using electronic signatures, doing away with the necessity for handwritten ones.

Customer Support

Nitro PDF includes a Knowledge Assistant powered by NitroAI® for better knowledge base search. You get access to user manuals, a video library, and a forum where you may interact with other people who use Nitro PDF. There are also FAQs that answer common user issues.

Users of Adobe Acrobat may interact with the community on the Adobe Forums to discuss issues and look for solutions. Live chat support is provided for corporate and commercial clients, providing immediate assistance. Users can also contact Adobe’s support staff by phone or fax if they prefer.

Pricing

Nitro PDF offers PDF Plans starting at approximately $219.28 per user, billed as a one-time purchase. They also provide eSign Plans at around $11.82 per user per month, billed annually. For those seeking both PDF and eSign solutions, the Platform Plans start from $9.99 per user per month, billed annually.

Adobe Acrobat offers various pricing plans. Acrobat Pro costs approximately $20 per month, and Acrobat Standard at around $13 per month. Acrobat for teams starts at about $24 per month per license. Pricing details for Acrobat for enterprise are available upon contacting Adobe directly.

Nitro PDF vs. Adobe Acrobat

Fill: The Best Alternative to Nitro PDF

Fill emerges as the third and best alternative to both Nitro PDF and Adobe Acrobat for various reasons. First, Fill prioritizes security and regulatory compliance, such as HIPAA. This is essential for handling confidential and sensitive data. Notably, this key feature is not found in our comparison between Nitro PDF vs Adobe Acrobat.

Moreover, Fill provides the unique advantage of unlimited and unrestricted envelopes for its users. Both Nitro PDF and Adobe Acrobat have limitations on the number and the file sizes of envelopes. Fill ensures you can send as many document envelopes, no matter the file size as your workflow requires.

In addition to these factors, Fill’s compatibility across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android, ensures accessibility on various devices. A critical compatibility feature not found in Nitro PDF.

Unlock seamless and secure PDF management with Fill. Sign up for a free account today.

Andria Pacina

Related Stories

Formstack vs. Google Forms

Formstack vs. Google Forms

The main difference between Formstack and Google Forms lies in their features and integrations. Formstack simplifies online form creation, assisting digital marketers in collecting data and payment. Google Forms, a tool within Google Apps for Work, allows users to collect data via surveys.

SurveyMonkey vs. Typeform

SurveyMonkey vs. Typeform

The main difference between SurveyMonkey and Typeform lies in the way they handle real-time notifications. SurveyMonkey excels at providing timely updates. Typeform takes a different approach by delivering daily or weekly roundups of your survey responses. 

Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

Ninja Forms vs. WPForms

The main difference between Ninja Forms and WPForms lies in their approach to pricing. WPForms has a more intuitive interface and broader options but is pricier. Ninja Forms offers a flexible, developer-friendly platform at a lower cost.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up