Koofr vs. Internxt

Koofr vs. Internxt

The main difference between Koofr and Internxt lies in integrations. Koofr allows integration with cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive. On the other hand, Internxt does not offer such integrations but focuses more on providing a private cloud storage environment.

Continue reading for an in-depth comparison of Koofr vs Internxt.

Comparing Koofr and Internxt

 

Platforms Supported

Cloud Storage

Integrations

Custom Branding

Pricing

Koofr

Windows

Mac

SaaS/Web

Android

iOS

Yes

Google Workspace, Microsoft Office, OneDrive, and more.

Yes

Free/Starts at €0.5 per month

Internxt

Windows

Mac

SaaS/Web

Android

iOS

Yes

Tresorit, DocHub, iCloud, and more.

N/A

Free/Starts at €0.89 per month

User Interface and Ease of Use

To better understand the unique aspects of Koofr vs Internxt, we need to delve into their individual user interfaces and assess their ease of use.

Koofr’s User Interface (UI) and ease of use are generally appreciated by users. The UI is controlled via a web app interface that extends to desktop and mobile apps, offering ease of use and fast transfer speeds. The interface is popular for being neat, simple, and user-friendly across platforms.

Internxt’s UI and ease of use are generally viewed positively. Reviews highlight its good user interface, with customers remarking on its efficiency and dedicated images section. They also describe the UI as exciting and easy to use, differing from other applications.

Koofr vs. Internxt

Data Sovereignty

Koofr’s privacy statement has been prepared under the European Regulation on Data Protection and Privacy, GDPR. This suggests that Koofr respects data sovereignty, i.e., that information is subject to the laws and governance structures within the nation it is collected. 

Internxt is also subject to GDPR as a European-based company, demonstrating its commitment to user data privacy and security. The company ensures privacy by providing a zero-knowledge file storage service, meaning only the user can access their files. Furthermore, Internxt emphasizes that they don’t possess or own your data; the user does. 

Customization and Branding

Koofr offers customization and branding options. Users can personalize their download and upload links through a feature called “Branding”. This allows users to align the appearance of their shared links with their own brand identity. These features affirm Koofr’s commitment to providing a customizable user experience.

On the other hand, Koofr alternative – Internxt, does appear to offer some level of customization and branding. They, however, provide advanced file and folder-sharing features, which can pass as a part of customization. Additionally, they have a media area on their website where product images, brand elements, and media assets are available for download.

Customer Support

Koofr provides a contact form on their website where users can send messages directly to them. They also operate a support forum on Reddit where they answer user questions, post new content, and initiate Koofr-related discussions. In terms of response time, they usually respond to support issues within a few hours, with priority given to paid accounts.

Internxt also offers customer support. Users can contact their team for any questions, issues, or feedback. They provide support through live chat, email, and even phone support.

Koofr vs. Internxt

Mobile Apps

Koofr has mobile applications for both iOS and Android platforms. These apps allow users to easily manage files and folders across devices and cloud storage accounts. They also provide a feature called Koofr Vault, which is accessible as a web application on mobile devices for enhanced data security. The company regularly updates these mobile applications, introducing new features and improvements.

Similarly, Internxt also has mobile apps for both Android and iOS platforms. These apps allow users to encrypt, store, back up, view, and send files and photos to the cloud with complete privacy. The Internxt Photos app can run on virtually any mobile device, enabling users to preview documents, browse photo galleries, and access all backups. They also provide seamless file management and secure cloud storage on the go.

Cost

As we bring our comparison of Koofr vs Internxt to a close, let’s turn our focus to their pricing plans.

Koofr offers a variety of pricing plans to suit different storage needs. They offer up to 10GB of free safe storage for users. For larger storage needs, their XXXL plan provides 2.5TB of space for around $233.

Internxt also offers a range of pricing options for its cloud storage services. Users can get up to 10GB of free storage with a free Internxt membership and 2GB of free storage just by signing up. If more storage is needed, Internxt offers a 20GB plan for $0.89 per month, a 200GB plan for $3.49 per month, and a 2TB plan for $8.99 per month. For businesses, prices start at $5, $10, and $95 a month.

Fill: A Better Choice to Koofr

While Fill might not be your traditional cloud storage platform like Koofr, it stands out as a robust alternative due to its unique offerings. Primarily an eSignature platform, Fill lets you create, manage, and electronically sign documents from anywhere, on any device.

In terms of security, Fill doesn’t compromise. With 256-bit Security, your sensitive documents are stored securely using HIPAA-compliant, military-grade encryption. This level of security is especially crucial in today’s digital age, where data breaches are increasingly common.

Fill also keeps you informed with real-time notifications. You will always stay updated and notified when a recipient annotates, signs, and completes a form. This feature allows for seamless collaboration and quick responses, enhancing productivity. Moreover, unlike Koofr, Fill offers real-time audit trails and logs. This feature provides transparency and accountability, allowing you to track every action taken on a document.

Get more than just storage – Experience Fill today. Book a demo here.

Amara Chiaha

Amara is a copywriter at Amplify Ventures who uses her experience with UX writing to provide relevant content structure for clients exploring HIPAA compliant document management solutions.

Related Stories

iDrive vs. Dropbox

iDrive vs. Dropbox

The main difference between iDrive and Dropbox lies in their collaboration tool offerings. iDrive allows you to share files using a public link and upholds synchronization across multiple devices. Dropbox provides a more sophisticated suite that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office.

ShareFile vs. Dropbox

ShareFile vs. Dropbox

The main difference between ShareFile and Dropbox lies in their file-sharing and storage approach. While both are cloud-based services, ShareFile focuses on business-related data storage. In contrast, Dropbox caters to both personal and professional data storage needs.

Egnyte vs. FileCloud

Egnyte vs. FileCloud

The main difference between Egnyte and FileCloud lies in the deployment options. While both offer cloud-based solutions, FileCloud also provides on-premise and hybrid cloud options for businesses requiring more data control. Egnyte, however, primarily focuses on its cloud offerings.

Get great articles direct to your inbox

    We’ll never share your details with third parties.
    View our Privacy Policy for more info.

    Arrow-up